Detect Replica Studios AI voices.
Suspect a clip was made with Replica Studios? Drop it in and get a citable verdict with the model named, in under half a second. Performance-oriented AI voices for games and film, with expressive cloned voices.
Replica Studios, and why it shows up in suspicious audio
Replica Studios makes AI voices aimed at games, film, and interactive media, with expressive, performance-directed cloned voices. It appears in production pipelines and, occasionally, in impersonation.
Its expressive delivery is convincing, but performance-tuned synthesis leaves artifacts a detector can read.
Where you tend to see it: Game and film voiceover, interactive media, and impersonation.
Replica Studios is a legitimate product; misuse is the problem, not the tool. You can read about it on the official Replica Studios site.
How to tell a Replica Studios voice
The human ear is unreliable on current Replica Studios audio. These are the signals a detector weighs. We report which ones drove the verdict rather than handing you a bare number.
- 01Expressive but slightly synthetic emotional contours, especially on emphasis.
- 02Consistency across takes a human performer would vary.
- 03Vocoder artifacts in fricatives.
- 04A clean noise floor uncharacteristic of a live booth.
A verdict you can cite, not a vibe
The detector reads the audio, not the speaker. Cloning or stock voice, clean or compressed, it looks for the synthesis signature and attributes the source.
Drop the clip
Upload a file or paste a URL. MP3, WAV, M4A, WebM, or the audio track of a video. About half a second of clear speech is enough.
The model scores it
The same model behind the public detector reads the acoustic signature and weighs the artifacts, then attributes the source, e.g. Replica Studios, when it recognizes it.
Get a citable verdict
You get a probability, a confidence level, the named model, and a permanent citation URL you can quote, file, or subpoena.
What to do next
A verdict is evidence, not a verdict of intent. Save the result to get a permanent citation URL and a one-way audio fingerprint you can reference later without storing the file. If you are a journalist or investigator, cite the verdict alongside your own reporting; if this is a suspected scam, treat the contact as unverified and confirm through a channel you already trust. The FTC's advice on suspected scam calls is a sensible baseline.
Building this into a workflow? The API returns the same verdict as JSON with webhooks for bulk jobs, and the browser extension checks audio in place on WhatsApp Web, YouTube, and podcasts.
Common questions
Can you detect a Replica Studios voice?
Does expressive delivery fool the detector?
Is a single check free?
Can I check a video's audio?
Will it name Replica specifically?
We attribute 24+ voice models
Is this a Replica Studios voice? Find out.
Free verdict, model named, in under a second. No card to start.