Detect Google WaveNet AI voices.
Suspect a clip was made with Google WaveNet? Drop it in and get a citable verdict with the model named, in under half a second. Google Cloud's WaveNet and Neural2 voices, a widely embedded, natural-sounding cloud TTS.
Google WaveNet, and why it shows up in suspicious audio
WaveNet is the DeepMind-derived neural voice technology behind Google Cloud Text-to-Speech, alongside the newer Neural2 voices. It is one of the most widely embedded cloud TTS systems, appearing in apps, assistants, and automated phone systems worldwide.
Its reach means WaveNet audio shows up in a huge variety of content, so attributing the source is often as useful as the synthetic-or-not verdict itself.
Where you tend to see it: App and assistant voices, automated calls, and narrated content.
Google WaveNet is a legitimate product; misuse is the problem, not the tool. You can read about it on the official Google WaveNet site.
How to tell a Google WaveNet voice
The human ear is unreliable on current Google WaveNet audio. These are the signals a detector weighs. We report which ones drove the verdict rather than handing you a bare number.
- 01Natural but metronomic pacing on longer output.
- 02A consistent spectral signature across a clip.
- 03Clean fricatives and phoneme transitions.
- 04A uniform noise floor uncharacteristic of a live microphone.
A verdict you can cite, not a vibe
The detector reads the audio, not the speaker. Cloning or stock voice, clean or compressed, it looks for the synthesis signature and attributes the source.
Drop the clip
Upload a file or paste a URL. MP3, WAV, M4A, WebM, or the audio track of a video. About half a second of clear speech is enough.
The model scores it
The same model behind the public detector reads the acoustic signature and weighs the artifacts, then attributes the source, e.g. Google WaveNet, when it recognizes it.
Get a citable verdict
You get a probability, a confidence level, the named model, and a permanent citation URL you can quote, file, or subpoena.
What to do next
A verdict is evidence, not a verdict of intent. Save the result to get a permanent citation URL and a one-way audio fingerprint you can reference later without storing the file. If you are a journalist or investigator, cite the verdict alongside your own reporting; if this is a suspected scam, treat the contact as unverified and confirm through a channel you already trust. The FTC's advice on suspected scam calls is a sensible baseline.
Building this into a workflow? The API returns the same verdict as JSON with webhooks for bulk jobs, and the browser extension checks audio in place on WhatsApp Web, YouTube, and podcasts.
Common questions
Can you detect Google WaveNet voices?
Does WaveNet versus Neural2 matter?
Is a single check free?
Can I check audio inside a video?
Will it name Google specifically?
We attribute 24+ voice models
Is this a Google WaveNet voice? Find out.
Free verdict, model named, in under a second. No card to start.