One detector, many decisions.
AI voice detection tells you how likely it is that a recorded voice was machine-generated. Fraud teams use it on calls that ask for money or codes, and contact centres use it to screen recorded calls at volume. Newsrooms check clips before they publish, investigators document evidence, and developers build it into products through an API. Every check returns a verdict on a four-step scale and an AI probability score, with a score for each segment on longer clips.
By the AI Voice Detector Editorial Team · Sources checked October 2026
- Fraud teamsStop the payment
- Contact centresRoute the call to review
- NewsroomsHold the clip
- Legal and investigationsAdd it to the case file
- DevelopersFlag it in the product
What does an AI voice verdict actually tell you?
Every result has three parts, whoever is reading it. The free check and the API use the same model, so the result means the same thing in both. It takes about a minute to learn to read one.
- 1AI score. How likely it is that the voice was machine-generated, from 0 to 100%. It is a likelihood, not a yes or no.
- 2Verdict. The score placed on a four-step scale: AI Generated (86% and above), Likely AI (50 to 85%), Likely Human (16 to 49%) and Human (below 16%). The two middle steps mean the call is not decisive.
- 3Segments. On longer clips, a score for each part of the recording, so you can see where it sounds synthetic. It does not say which tool made the voice.
How a recording becomes a decision. You choose what each verdict triggers.
Three ways to misread a verdict
"A low score means the call is safe."
It means the voice is probably human. The person could still be lying, so the request goes through your normal checks.
"A high score settles it."
Only on a clean clip. A high score on a two-second clip does not prove much, and the app warns you when a clip is under three seconds or recorded at low quality.
"The detector tells me who is speaking."
It tells you whether a voice is synthetic, not whose voice it is.
The detector accepts MP3, WAV, M4A, OGG, FLAC and AAC. Longer, cleaner audio gives better results, and a borderline score lands in Likely AI or Likely Human rather than a firm call. Guides for specific voice tools live on the detect a voice pages, and the method is explained in how to detect AI voices.
Which use case is yours?
Six teams read the same result and act differently. Pick yours to jump to how they work.
Is this caller really who they say they are?
Which recorded calls need a human to listen?
Can we run this clip?
Can we show how we tested this recording?
Was this track made with an AI music tool?
Should we build detection or buy it?
Compare all six side by side
| You are | The decision you face | What the verdict gives you | What it cannot do |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fraud teamsBanks, insurers and KYC | Is this caller really who they say they are? | A written reason to stop the payment or escalate | Works on recordings, not live calls. Does not identify the speaker. |
| Contact centresQA and risk leads | Which recorded calls need a human to listen? | A ranked review queue from thousands of recordings | Checks the voice, not what was said. API on paid plans. |
| NewsroomsEditors and fact-checkers | Can we run this clip? | A documented check to support the call either way | Does not verify the story or the source. |
| Legal and investigationsCounsel and investigators | Can we show how we tested this recording? | A test result an expert can repeat | Does not decide admissibility. |
| DevelopersPlatform and product teams | Should we build detection or buy it? | The same verdict, returned as JSON | Works on files, not live streams. Paid plans only. |
| Music and audioLabels, platforms and producers | Was this track made with an AI music tool? | A check built for songs, not speech | Use the AI music detector, not the voice check. |
Swipe sideways to see every column
How do fraud teams use AI voice detection?
A recorded voice asks for money, a one-time passcode or an account change, and an analyst has to decide whether to act. Tools such as ElevenLabs and Resemble can clone a voice from a short sample, so the caller can sound exactly like a customer, an executive or a colleague.
Complaints involving AI reported to the FBI in 2025, with about 893 million dollars lost. Voice cloning was named in business email compromise and family emergency scams.
FBI IC3 2025 reportRecordings worth screening
- 01A voicemail or call recording that asks someone to read out a one-time passcode. No legitimate caller needs it (FTC, March 2024).
- 02An executive's voice instructing an urgent wire or a change of bank details.
- 03A help desk call asking for a password or MFA reset. The FBI and CISA describe Scattered Spider using this pretext (CISA AA23-320A). MITRE lists it as voice spearphishing (ATT&CK T1566.004).
- 04Insurance. A recorded statement in a claim, where the voice is the main evidence.
- 05KYC. A voice sample submitted during onboarding or account recovery, where a cloned voice could pass as the applicant.
An AI Generated verdict on a clean recording backs up a hunch with evidence. The analyst can stop the payment, escalate and attach the verdict to the file.
The detector works on recordings, not live calls, and it does not identify the speaker. A low score does not make a request safe. Use it alongside callbacks and dual approval, not instead of them.
Where does detection sit next to your other controls?
Each control answers a different question, and only detection looks at the audio itself. They work best together.
| Control | What it answers | Blind spot | Flags a cloned voice on a recording? |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI voice detection | Is this recorded voice machine-generated? | Who is speaking, or whether the request is genuine. | Yes |
| Voice biometrics | Does this voice match an enrolled customer? | A good clone of the customer's voice may still pass. | Not by design |
| Caller ID with STIR/SHAKEN | Was the number attested on participating networks? (FCC) | Who is speaking. Caller ID spoofing is common (FCC). | No |
| Callback to a known number | Does the real person confirm the request? | Nothing about a recording you already have. | Indirectly |
| One-time passcode | Does the person signing in hold the device? | Whether someone talked them into reading the code aloud. | No |
Swipe sideways to see every column
How do call centres detect AI voice fraud in recorded calls?
A contact centre records thousands of calls a day. A QA or risk lead cannot listen to all of them, and a cloned voice on a call to reset an account or move money sounds like any other customer. The job is to find the few recordings a person should hear.
Send stored recordings to the REST API from your own job. Each call comes back with a verdict, an AI score and per-segment scores, so the review team starts with the calls that score high and moves on.
| Recording | AI score | Verdict | Next step |
|---|---|---|---|
| call_0193.wavAccount reset | 91% | AI Generated | Send to review |
| call_0195.wavPayment change | 58% | Likely AI | Re-check a cleaner copy |
| call_0196.wavBalance query | 12% | Human | Normal checks |
| call_0194.wavAddress update | 7% | Human | Normal checks |
- 01Export recordingsPull stored call recordings from your call recording or QA platform.
- 02Check each fileUpload each recording, then request a detection. The verdict comes back in the same call.
- 03Review what scores highRoute AI Generated calls to a reviewer. Re-check Likely AI calls with a cleaner copy.
Reviewers spend their time on the handful of calls most likely to involve a synthetic voice, with a verdict attached to each one.
The detector checks whether the voice is machine-generated. It does not transcribe calls or search them for what was said, so it will not flag fraud mentioned in a call by a real person. It works on recordings, not live calls, and API access is on the paid plans.
How do newsrooms verify audio before publishing?
An editor has a leaked clip of a public figure and has to decide whether to run it. Public figures have hours of speeches online, which is more than enough to clone their voice.
Regulators take this seriously. In February 2024 the FCC ruled that AI-generated voices in robocalls count as artificial voices under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (FCC, 8 February 2024). So those calls need the same consent as any prerecorded call.
A pre-publication audio check
Six steps · three stagesSecure the file
- 01Get the original file from the source, not a screen recording or a re-share.
Test the voice
- 02Run it through the detector and note the verdict, the AI score and which segments score high.
- 03If the verdict is borderline or the app warns about the clip, get a longer or cleaner copy before you draw any conclusion.
Report it out
- 04Check provenance. Look for C2PA Content Credentials where the publishing tool supports them.
- 05Check what the clip says against independent sources, as you would any claim.
- 06Write down what you checked and when, so the desk can explain its decision later.
The desk gets a documented reason to hold the clip, or one more piece of support for running it. Either way, the decision is on the record.
A verdict does not verify the story. It only tells you whether the voice shows signs of being generated. The full method is in how to verify AI audio.
Can an AI voice verdict support a legal case?
Investigators and counsel need something narrower than editors do: a test of the recording that the other side can check. In US federal courts, Rule 901 requires evidence that an item is what its proponent claims (Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 901).
A detector verdict can be one part of that evidence, alongside chain of custody, metadata and witness testimony. It does not replace any of them.
"We listened and it sounded fake."
An opinion with no stated method and nothing for the other side to test.
"AI score 88%, AI Generated, run on the hashed original."
A documented analysis with a stated method that an expert can re-run.
Preserve before you analyze
- 1Keep the original file exactly as received, with its name, size and dates.
- 2Compute and record a hash of the original before anyone opens it in an editor.
- 3Run the detector on a copy of the original, never on a re-recorded or converted version.
- 4Save the result with the date, the verdict, the AI score and the segment scores.
- 5Give the file and the verdict to your expert so they can re-run the test.
- File
- call_2026-03-14.wav
- Received
- 2026-03-15 · from counsel
- SHA-256
- 9f2c71ad 0b3e … 55c8e41a
- AI score
- 88%
- Verdict
- AI Generated
- Segments
- 4 of 5 flagged
We do not rule on admissibility or identify the speaker, and we are not a law firm. How a verdict is used in a case is up to counsel and the court. More on method is in audio authentication.
How do developers add AI voice detection to a product?
You can train and maintain your own detector, or call ours. The REST API returns the same verdict as the free check in JSON, so your product can act on it automatically. API access is on Starter and above.
- 01 · Send a recording
POST /api/v1/uploads/voice PUT {signed upload URL} POST /api/v1/detect/voice - 02 · Receive the verdict
{ "verdict": "likely_ai", "ai_score_percent": 83, "segment_count": 4 } - 03 · Act on your threshold
if (r.ai_score_percent >= threshold) { routeToReview(file) }
Common integration patterns
- Overnight screening
- Check stored call recordings from a scheduled job and send flagged files to a review queue.
- Upload checks
- Check voice notes or audio posts as users upload them to your platform.
- Case tools
- Add a button to a case management tool that attaches a verdict to the record.
- Contracts and volume
- Over 20,000 detections a month, or need invoicing? Contact sales.
The API analyzes files, not live audio streams. You set the threshold, based on what a false alarm costs you. Plans and volumes are on the pricing page.
How do you check whether a song was made with AI?
Songs are not voicemails. A track carries instruments, effects and mixed vocals, so the question is whether the music was produced with a tool such as Suno, not whether a caller is real.
For that, use the AI music detector. It is the check built for songs. The Suno guide covers one of the most common generators.
Frequently asked questions
What is AI voice detection used for?
It helps people decide whether a recorded voice is human or machine-generated before they act on it. Fraud teams use it on calls that request money or codes. Contact centres use it to screen recorded calls at volume. Newsrooms use it before publishing audio. Investigators use it to document evidence. Developers build it into their own products through an API.
Does the detector monitor live phone calls?
No. It analyzes recordings that already exist, such as a saved voicemail, a call recording, a voice note or an uploaded clip. It does not intercept, monitor or block live calls. Teams that need screening at volume send recordings to the REST API from their own call recording or case tools.
Can a contact centre screen recorded calls automatically?
Yes, through the REST API on the paid plans. Your system sends each stored call recording to the API and receives a verdict for each one in the same call. The detector checks whether the voice is machine-generated. It does not transcribe calls or search them for what was said.
What does a verdict include?
Three things: an AI probability score from 0 to 100%, a verdict on a four-step scale from Human to AI Generated, and on longer clips a score for each segment. Read them together. A high score on a short or compressed clip is not a strong result.
Can I check a recording for free?
Yes. The public detector at aivoicedetector.com/is-this-ai checks a single recording for free with no account. Upload a voicemail, a call recording or a voice note and read the verdict on screen. API access and higher volumes start on the paid plans, which are listed with their prices on the pricing page.
Is an AI voice verdict proof in court?
Not on its own. Under US Federal Rule of Evidence 901, the party offering a recording must show it is what they claim it is. A documented detector verdict can be one part of that showing. Whether it is admitted, and how much weight it carries, is for counsel and the court.
Why would a verdict come back borderline?
A Likely AI or Likely Human verdict usually means the clip gave the model too little to work with. Very short clips, heavy compression from phone networks or messaging apps, a recording replayed through a speaker, and music or overlapping voices all make results less reliable. Ask for the original file, avoid re-recording it on another device, and run the clearest copy you have.
Have a recording you are not sure about?
Check it free, no account needed. Screening at volume or need a contract? Talk to sales.